Stourbr*dge Updates
-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 5642
- Joined: 21 May 2011, 11:27
Re: Stourbr*dge Updates
Donnelly, take a bow!!
-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 5642
- Joined: 21 May 2011, 11:27
Re: Stourbr*dge Updates
Sub: Kelly on for Donnelly
-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 5642
- Joined: 21 May 2011, 11:27
Re: Stourbr*dge Updates
Full time: 2.2
- andy
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 7405
- Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 18:43
- lutleyyeltz
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: 01 May 2011, 07:58
- Location: Just over the border in Heathen territory!
Re: Stourbr*dge Updates
Donnelly having been booked, earlier,
now misses the Stamford game!
now misses the Stamford game!
-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 2155
- Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 18:15
Re: Stourbr*dge Updates
Would have been harsh for us to lose that. We didnt play that well, but in fairness, Sourbridge stopped us playing. We had several decent chances, but couldnt put them to bed. Id say Sour had more possesion, particularily first half and won pretty much every loose ball. Fair result in the end imho.
- andy
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 7405
- Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 18:43
Re: Stourbr*dge Updates
I'm not sure it was a fair result. For 75 minutes Stour caused us no problems at all and we could of had 3 by then. How they then went in front just felt like a smash and grab to me. The equaliser was the least we deserved. It was quite a poor game otherwise and Stour were overall one of the worst sides I've seen this season. Great resilience shown by the lads after falling behind, we could have crumbled, but instead hit them with a lovely equaliser. Onwards to Stamford!
Proud owner of FOUR Georges





- andy
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 7405
- Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 18:43
Re: Stourbr*dge Updates
Desperately clutching at straws, I guess the BSC doesn't count?lutleyyeltz wrote: ↑30 Nov 2024, 17:01Donnelly having been booked, earlier,
now misses the Stamford game!
Proud owner of FOUR Georges





-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 2155
- Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 18:15
Re: Stourbr*dge Updates
No I agree they didnt threaten much at all. But they had a lot of possesion and I disagree about the worst side. Average Id say, but I dont think we set the world alight and that was due to them harrying us We had more chances, but they stopped us playing well. They were 5th at the start and that aint a fluke.andy wrote: ↑30 Nov 2024, 18:17I'm not sure it was a fair result. For 75 minutes Stour caused us no problems at all and we could of had 3 by then. How they then went in front just felt like a smash and grab to me. The equaliser was the least we deserved. It was quite a poor game otherwise and Stour were overall one of the worst sides I've seen this season. Great resilience shown by the lads after falling behind, we could have crumbled, but instead hit them with a lovely equaliser. Onwards to Stamford!
-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 2155
- Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 18:15
Re: Stourbr*dge Updates
I'll just add I think that was their game plan and it worked.