Page 1 of 3
Frickley Updates
Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 14:42
by Johnny Bud
1. Platt
2. Bragoli
3. Digie
4. Denny
5. Morrison
6. Charlton
7. Goddard
8. Birley
9. Anderson
10. Bowerman
11. Chilton
Re: Frickley Updates
Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 14:44
by Johnny Bud
12. Delaney
14. Melvin
15. Griffiths
16. Cleet
17. Hancocks
Re: Frickley Updates
Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 15:44
by Johnny Bud
Losing 1.0
Re: Frickley Updates
Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 15:47
by Johnny Bud
Half time: 0.1
Re: Frickley Updates
Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 15:49
by RaidenYeltz
I blame the ref.
Nothing to do with the tactically spot on formation and selection. Keep this up and we'll surely win! If we get the rub of the green with the referee decisions.
Re: Frickley Updates
Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 16:08
by Johnny Bud
1.1 Anderson
Re: Frickley Updates
Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 16:30
by Johnny Bud
Sub: Melvin for Chilton
Re: Frickley Updates
Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 16:49
by Johnny Bud
Losing 2.1
Re: Frickley Updates
Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 17:01
by RaidenYeltz
Even 1-1 would have represented a poor result.
Anyone who defends the management and players after that selction and performance is a moron.
The selection was odd if not completely baffling. Firstly, why change a successful formula and secondly why play square pegs in round holes? Bragoli and Chilton wing backs? Diggie as a centre back? What the hell? What happened to Delaney, who has been on fire?
I like 352 but in order to be successful you need two good full backs, who can defend and attack equally. We haven't got that luxury, with respect to Bragoli and Chilton. Where was Griffiths?
Did John treat this as a gimmie and play a second strength side?
I know I don't go to every game nor am I a manager, but from what I've witnessed this season 442 with Anderson and Delaney up top is our best selection.
Awful. Absolutely awful.
Re: Frickley Updates
Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 17:16
by wednesburystokie
RaidenYeltz wrote:Even 1-1 would have represented a poor result.
Anyone who defends the management and players after that selction and performance is a moron.
The selection was odd if not completely baffling. Firstly, why change a successful formula and secondly why play square pegs in round holes? Bragoli and Chilton wing backs? Diggie as a centre back? What the hell? What happened to Delaney, who has been on fire?
I like 352 but in order to be successful you need two good full backs, who can defend and attack equally. We haven't got that luxury, with respect to Bragoli and Chilton. Where was Griffiths?
Did John treat this as a gimmie and play a second strength side?
I know I don't go to every game nor am I a manager, but from what I've witnessed this season 442 with Anderson and Delaney up top is our best selection.
Awful. Absolutely awful.
Did you change your opinion from your Twitter post just after the game?