Matlock Updates

Scores, live updates, discussion etc. on Yeltz matches
Johnny Bud
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: 21 May 2011, 11:27

Re: Matlock Updates

Post by Johnny Bud » 18 Oct 2016, 21:00

Attendance: 353

drummyb
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 1907
Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 18:15

Re: Matlock Updates

Post by drummyb » 18 Oct 2016, 21:02

We should be level!!

User avatar
andy
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 6923
Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 18:43

Re: Matlock Updates

Post by andy » 18 Oct 2016, 21:03

Playing some well decent stuff but we cant hit a barn door.

Johnny Bud
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: 21 May 2011, 11:27

Re: Matlock Updates

Post by Johnny Bud » 18 Oct 2016, 21:10

Losing 2.0

Johnny Bud
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: 21 May 2011, 11:27

Re: Matlock Updates

Post by Johnny Bud » 18 Oct 2016, 21:12

Sub: Morrison on for Hancocks

Johnny Bud
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: 21 May 2011, 11:27

Re: Matlock Updates

Post by Johnny Bud » 18 Oct 2016, 21:12

Sub: Delaney on for Haynes

Johnny Bud
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: 21 May 2011, 11:27

Re: Matlock Updates

Post by Johnny Bud » 18 Oct 2016, 21:25

Losing 3.0

Johnny Bud
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: 21 May 2011, 11:27

Re: Matlock Updates

Post by Johnny Bud » 18 Oct 2016, 21:30

MOTM: Silva

Johnny Bud
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 5353
Joined: 21 May 2011, 11:27

Re: Matlock Updates

Post by Johnny Bud » 18 Oct 2016, 21:36

Full time: lost 3.0

RaidenYeltz
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 1740
Joined: 31 Jul 2013, 11:15

Re: Matlock Updates

Post by RaidenYeltz » 18 Oct 2016, 21:47

First half we played well, we created numerous chances and should've scored. (Especially via set pieces).

Second half we just folded. But even at 1-0 down we looked capable of scoring. That is the difference to previous home games - we looked like scoring, that to me is what good football is about.

However after a well taken second it was game over.

Tonight is probably a hint of what is to come when Anderson leaves. I guess the difference between tonight and our previous results is the the fact that our chances fell to other players other than Anderson.

Had the chances we created fell to Anderson in the first half, we'd have gone in 3-0 up.

One thing I'd like to question, still, is why oh why aren't we giving Anderson support in the form of a partner up top? Either push Goddard up further or start with Delaney.

I suppose the usual suspects will point to recent results and his goal scoring record and say 'it's working'. I'd tend to disagree. He has scored wonderful solo goals recently and converted one chance a game. The only chance we've created (in games I've attended).

Imagine where we'd be and how many he would score if we were giving him service and providing 4/5 chances a game?

Second half Matlock doubled up on Anderson and it rendered us ineffective. So our get out jail card was neautrilased and we simply had no answer.

We need a plan B. Firstly when teams figure out our long ball to Anderson home run tactic and secondly a viable tactic for when we go one down.

Post Reply