Re: Friendlies
-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 15:10
Re: Friendlies
I've read it a thousand times and I'm still baffled!
I'm assuming you'd miss a friendly against WBA? on the grounds that we'd just be doing it to earn some money!
I'm assuming you'd miss a friendly against WBA? on the grounds that we'd just be doing it to earn some money!
-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 02 May 2011, 21:04
Re: Friendlies
I'll ask you to read my comment again,I never said it was a bad thing did I, I was just stating the truth behind the friendly and of course it's a good idea and I hope it generates alot of money for both clubs.I think you have all taken it out of hand it was just a passing comment.I think it's because it looks abut sarky typing it on a forum but if u was to say it to someone it would be taken lightly.I think we have other things to worry about than a passing comment on a forum.
- lutleyyeltz
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 1891
- Joined: 01 May 2011, 07:58
- Location: Just over the border in Heathen territory!
Re: Friendlies
I vowed that I wouldn't get involved with this, but, if you took a little care in compiling your posts then maybe others wouldn't mis-interpret what you were trying to say!
-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 02 May 2011, 22:11
Re: Friendlies
Fair enough, simple misunderstanding. No need to take it any further.
- uncle jack and coke
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 159
- Joined: 01 May 2011, 09:59
- Location: Dudley
Re: Friendlies
Come on let's be fair. The real reason behind these matches is that Stourbr*dge obviously believe that the only way they will win any silverware next season is to invite a team from a lower league to play them in a tournement that they've devised!!!!
************** PUTS TONGUE FIRMLY IN CHEEK*********
(Just so there is no misunderstanding)-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 16 May 2011, 18:59
Re: Friendlies
Not seen anything 'Official' from Stourbr*dge yet, re: the proposed friendlies.
On Stour forum 'The Reasonable Man' suggests this is a wind-up.
Surely if the match was a tribute to Hugh Clark, his son would know about it, and it would have been announced by Stourbr*dge first.
If the games are in the planning stage, then the forums should wait until all the arangements have been made and they are announced officially.
On Stour forum 'The Reasonable Man' suggests this is a wind-up.
Surely if the match was a tribute to Hugh Clark, his son would know about it, and it would have been announced by Stourbr*dge first.
If the games are in the planning stage, then the forums should wait until all the arangements have been made and they are announced officially.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 464
- Joined: 01 May 2011, 00:03
Re: Friendlies
We get a new owner and Stour start having second thoughts in case were not such a pushover as they hoped!redstripe1876 wrote: Not seen anything 'Official' from Stourbr*dge yet, re: the proposed friendlies.
On Stour forum 'The Reasonable Man' suggests this is a wind-up.
Surely if the match was a tribute to Hugh Clark, his son would know about it, and it would have been announced by Stourbr*dge first.
If the games are in the planning stage, then the forums should wait until all the arangements have been made and they are announced officially.
- Laurel Lane Lamper
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: 30 Apr 2011, 13:35
- Location: Hales Owen, Worcestershire
- Contact:
Re: Friendlies
The opening message of this thread is from our football match secretary, which would seem to be adequate confirmation.redstripe1876 wrote: Not seen anything 'Official' from Stourbr*dge yet, re: the proposed friendlies.
On Stour forum 'The Reasonable Man' suggests this is a wind-up.
Surely if the match was a tribute to Hugh Clark, his son would know about it, and it would have been announced by Stourbr*dge first.
If the games are in the planning stage, then the forums should wait until all the arangements have been made and they are announced officially.
“Would you like to bet against us?”
-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 13 May 2011, 22:18
Re: Friendlies
Hi folks im a stour fan who comes in peace. Firstly congrats for getting those idiots out of your club. IT was me who posted on the stour forum regarding our friendlies and can confirm thegames will be for the Hugh Clark trophy. this info comes straight from Gary Hackett so i can assure you its correct. good luck in which ever league you play in next year and hopfully you will soon be back in your rightfull place as the SECOND BEST non league team in the area.redstripe1876 wrote: Not seen anything 'Official' from Stourbr*dge yet, re: the proposed friendlies.
On Stour forum 'The Reasonable Man' suggests this is a wind-up.
Surely if the match was a tribute to Hugh Clark, his son would know about it, and it would have been announced by Stourbr*dge first.
If the games are in the planning stage, then the forums should wait until all the arangements have been made and they are announced officially.
Last edited by YeltzDoc on 16 May 2011, 21:57, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Yeltz Forum Member
- Posts: 160
- Joined: 16 May 2011, 20:55
Re: Friendlies
I would't read too much into my ignorance. Nobody ever tells me anything!redstripe1876 wrote: On Stour forum 'The Reasonable Man' suggests this is a wind-up.
Surely if the match was a tribute to Hugh Clark, his son would know about it, and it would have been announced by Stourbr*dge first.
If the games are in the planning stage, then the forums should wait until all the arangements have been made and they are announced officially.