Fund Raising Is Just Giving The Answer??
Posted: 25 Jan 2018, 12:42
Hello everybody
I am a long term supporter and long term reader of this site, but I have only recently registered and able to post.
I think its a shame of what's happened to the club in recent seasons and certainly only want what is best for the club. I was at the recent Nantwich Town game and it made me sad to see just 300 people there for a Saturday fixture.
I have seen the attempts at raising funds via just giving but I am not sure this is the answer.
Why should the supporters give someone else money to purchase the club, or to put another way, why should someone receive an asset of £50k when only putting £20k in themselves. If someone asked you to give them money so they could purchase a car that you would have no control over, would you do it?
Could I not float the idea, even just for a discussion that people can purchase part of the club in a form on a consortium. For example if 60 people put in £500 each to be part owners that would raise the £30k required which would add to the £20k that Colin and Karen would put up.
Then people are actually getting something for their money and would increase the likelihood of getting Halesowen back on track. I wouldn't object to anyone owning 51% of the club and the consortium the rest if that was an option.
I don't go to every game but when I do I see various people such as Accountants, Lawyers, Policeman etc that could bring something to the table as far as experience and governance that our clubs need and would be great as part of the consortium.
I would be interested in peoples views and please I hope you read this the way it was intended and that is to support Halesowen with my heart and not pointing a negative finger at anybody.
Yours Truly
Rusty
I am a long term supporter and long term reader of this site, but I have only recently registered and able to post.
I think its a shame of what's happened to the club in recent seasons and certainly only want what is best for the club. I was at the recent Nantwich Town game and it made me sad to see just 300 people there for a Saturday fixture.
I have seen the attempts at raising funds via just giving but I am not sure this is the answer.
Why should the supporters give someone else money to purchase the club, or to put another way, why should someone receive an asset of £50k when only putting £20k in themselves. If someone asked you to give them money so they could purchase a car that you would have no control over, would you do it?
Could I not float the idea, even just for a discussion that people can purchase part of the club in a form on a consortium. For example if 60 people put in £500 each to be part owners that would raise the £30k required which would add to the £20k that Colin and Karen would put up.
Then people are actually getting something for their money and would increase the likelihood of getting Halesowen back on track. I wouldn't object to anyone owning 51% of the club and the consortium the rest if that was an option.
I don't go to every game but when I do I see various people such as Accountants, Lawyers, Policeman etc that could bring something to the table as far as experience and governance that our clubs need and would be great as part of the consortium.
I would be interested in peoples views and please I hope you read this the way it was intended and that is to support Halesowen with my heart and not pointing a negative finger at anybody.
Yours Truly
Rusty