Page 1 of 2
Allocations 2016/17
Posted: 22 Mar 2016, 09:37
by yeltz85
Latest Allocations for next season, increase in potential attendances next season with games against Hednesford and Stafford as it stands.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... edit#gid=0
League Map,
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mi ... SggA7td37I
Re: Allocations 2016/17
Posted: 22 Mar 2016, 12:37
by RaidenYeltz
Shaw Lane Aquaforce?
Has to be one of the strangest names in football?
Re: Allocations 2016/17
Posted: 22 Mar 2016, 13:16
by Wheels
RaidenYeltz wrote:Shaw Lane Aquaforce?
Has to be one of the strangest names in football?
they are based in Barnsley on Shaw Lane. Oddly enough!
Re: Allocations 2016/17
Posted: 23 Mar 2016, 08:35
by RaidenYeltz
Wheels wrote:RaidenYeltz wrote:Shaw Lane Aquaforce?
Has to be one of the strangest names in football?
they are based in Barnsley on Shaw Lane. Oddly enough!
What about the Aquaforce?
Re: Allocations 2016/17
Posted: 23 Mar 2016, 08:57
by Wheels
RaidenYeltz wrote:Wheels wrote:RaidenYeltz wrote:Shaw Lane Aquaforce?
Has to be one of the strangest names in football?
they are based in Barnsley on Shaw Lane. Oddly enough!
What about the Aquaforce?
maybe they're particularly good when it's raining! Seriously though , there were only formed in 2012.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaw_Lane_Aquaforce_F.C.
Re: Allocations 2016/17
Posted: 23 Mar 2016, 22:47
by juanillo
I know I am being selective here, but I think I still favour trips to the likes of Cambridge, Weymouth, Dorchester, Cirencester, Stratford etc over a day out in Barnsley, Hednesford, Stafford and Skelmersdale.
We could be losing some of the better ones in the North as well like Stamford, Rammy and Whitby.
Re: Allocations 2016/17
Posted: 24 Mar 2016, 09:42
by HalesowenHarry
If Stourbr*dge somehow go up, then I'd happily go back south again, otherwise I'd prefer us to stay north
Re: Allocations 2016/17
Posted: 24 Mar 2016, 12:10
by The Reasonable Man
HalesowenHarry wrote:If Stourbr*dge somehow go up, then I'd happily go back south again, otherwise I'd prefer us to stay north
Funny, ain't it?! Even though I think the NPL is more competitive than the SL, and a harder League to get out of (though not all of our fans agree), I'd far rather stay in the NPL if we don't go up. For my money, it's a million times better in most respects than the SL.
Re: Allocations 2016/17
Posted: 24 Mar 2016, 12:49
by old git
The Reasonable Man wrote:HalesowenHarry wrote:If Stourbr*dge somehow go up, then I'd happily go back south again, otherwise I'd prefer us to stay north
Funny, ain't it?! Even though I think the NPL is more competitive than the SL, and a harder League to get out of (though not all of our fans agree), I'd far rather stay in the NPL if we don't go up. For my money, it's a million times better in most respects than the SL.
Agreed. Better people in the North by far. The Southerners are not half as welcoming
Re: Allocations 2016/17
Posted: 24 Mar 2016, 13:46
by RaidenYeltz
I'm not very impressed with the standard in this league, if I'm honest.
I believe if we keep the current group together and add a little bit more quality wise and get rid of those who clearly aren't good enough, we could easily reach the play offs, or at least have a push for them next year. Could we do likewise in the South?
Darlington are about the best I've seen this season. The rest have been average. Salford and Stourbr*dge in relatively recent games (Boxing day is recent, surely?) haven't been impressive. Infact there's a good argument we deserved to win those games. And they're supposedly two of the best teams in the league.