Leek v Lincoln

General Discussion about the mighty Yeltz
User avatar
YeltzDoc
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 3667
Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 07:33
Location: Huby

Re: Leek v Lincoln

Post by YeltzDoc » 28 Mar 2014, 07:57

gingeryeltz wrote:
AVFCYELTZ wrote: Be careful what you say or your 3 George's could be deducted! (unlike Leek's 3 points, eh Raiden?)
I'm up in court next week for speeding. I need Raiden to come and represent me as my lawyer.
Then I know I'll be fine as he doesn't want anybody to get three points.

Ba da Bum. Tish.

I'm here all week, etc..

User avatar
lutleyyeltz
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 1882
Joined: 01 May 2011, 07:58
Location: Just over the border in Heathen territory!

Re: Leek v Lincoln

Post by lutleyyeltz » 28 Mar 2014, 08:05

I agree that it is totally unjust that the League sees fit, under their rules of course, that the two matters are considered as one. Raiden is entitled to his views and, as has been pointed out, he is not alone.
It is very convenient to hide behind a rule book to justify what, to most other interested parties, is blatantly unfair.
I accept that no appeal or continued complaining will make one iota of difference, but I wish to support the views of those who think that the decision stinks.
I fail to see how any questioning over the decision defines Yeltz supporters as "whingers" when we are not alone in our views.

Respectfully

A pi**ed of Lutters

Noggin
Global Moderator
Posts: 954
Joined: 01 May 2011, 18:56

Re: Leek v Lincoln

Post by Noggin » 28 Mar 2014, 08:31

If I have offended anyone with earlier comments, I apologise. I can't help thinking though, that if the thrust of my point had agreed with with your line of thinking that you might have actually thought it was slightly witty? A little bit of faux outrage maybe?

As for the matter in hand, the league decision stands. It follows plenty of precedents in the way that clubs becoming defunct are handled. It may rankle, it may not be natural justice, but it is not going to change.
Whether you like, I like it or anyone else likes it is immaterial.

Personally, I do not think it is actually fair in the sense of justice being seen to be done, but this is not the point {pun intended}. The league has followed the same rules as any other league would do in the circumstances of a club folding mid-season.

As far as I'm concerned. Endex

Westyeltz
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 994
Joined: 15 May 2011, 08:43

Re: Leek v Lincoln

Post by Westyeltz » 28 Mar 2014, 12:27

[quote="YeltzDoc")


Ba da Bum. Tish.

I'm here all week, etc..[/quote]

Are you? Are you not away in some frozen post communist wasteland somewhere, like Stourbr*dge?

User avatar
YeltzDoc
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 3667
Joined: 29 Apr 2011, 07:33
Location: Huby

Re: Leek v Lincoln

Post by YeltzDoc » 28 Mar 2014, 12:40

Amsterdam this week. Post Communists next week - Zagreb and Maribor.
Stourbr*dge, hopefully never.

TheOldOne
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 28 Mar 2014, 12:47

Re: Leek v Lincoln

Post by TheOldOne » 28 Mar 2014, 12:51

Just a comment from a long time Leek supporter. A little bit of research will show our BIG MONEY goalscorer from Brackley is actually a former Leek player, getting 10 minutes a game at Brackley. He is back at Leek because he wants to play football, money is not an issue.

User avatar
Colin Bobble
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 101
Joined: 08 May 2011, 12:12
Location: Hampshire

Re: Leek v Lincoln

Post by Colin Bobble » 28 Mar 2014, 13:52

lutleyyeltz wrote:I agree that it is totally unjust that the League sees fit, under their rules of course, that the two matters are considered as one. Raiden is entitled to his views and, as has been pointed out, he is not alone.
It is very convenient to hide behind a rule book to justify what, to most other interested parties, is blatantly unfair.
I accept that no appeal or continued complaining will make one iota of difference, but I wish to support the views of those who think that the decision stinks.
I fail to see how any questioning over the decision defines Yeltz supporters as "whingers" when we are not alone in our views.

Respectfully

A pi**ed of Lutters
And if the boot was on the other foot I know exactly what you and the other "whingers" would be saying.

You said it yourself, above, the league dealt with it according to their rules. How else would you expect it to be dealt with!!!?

What a bunch of sour grapes.

User avatar
lutleyyeltz
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 1882
Joined: 01 May 2011, 07:58
Location: Just over the border in Heathen territory!

Re: Leek v Lincoln

Post by lutleyyeltz » 28 Mar 2014, 14:05

But, the boot isn't on the other foot, is it? ::)
I feel that an injustice has been done and that's it - stuff what you presume to know!

RaidenYeltz
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 1740
Joined: 31 Jul 2013, 11:15

Re: Leek v Lincoln

Post by RaidenYeltz » 28 Mar 2014, 14:16

lutleyyeltz wrote:But, the boot isn't on the other foot, is it? ::)
I feel that an injustice has been done and that's it - stuff what you presume to know!
Debating is futile...

Ignoring is the best option.

beastyyeltz
Yeltz Forum Member
Posts: 525
Joined: 10 Dec 2012, 18:16
Location: Halesowen

Re: Leek v Lincoln

Post by beastyyeltz » 28 Mar 2014, 15:35

Raiden is right, debate is futile. Everybody has different views on this injustice, and that's the way it will be. Shouldn't we concentrate on things that matter e.g.: The league and the fact we are top of it, instead of fighting amongst ourselves

Post Reply