Page 1 of 1
Is it just me?
Posted: 22 Aug 2013, 09:55
by lutleyyeltz
watsisnerm wrote:Steve Glass wrote: last night the `language` was a bit blue, to say the least...remember there`s children in ear-shot!
Whilst I agree that kids should not be exposed to foul language, I take issue with the three sets of parents

who each had a small child, no older than 2 years, in a pushchair. These kids were obviously tired and were crying constantly throughout the second half. They should have been in bed!
My concern is not particularly for the children, it's for ME - I go to a match, and the pub beforehand, to enjoy myself, not to have to listen to screaming kids !
Yours faithfully
King Herod's biggest fan!
Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 22 Aug 2013, 10:35
by HalesowenHarry
So it's ok if they come to Saturday afternoon games, tired or not?
Don't stand by me on Saturdays................
Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 22 Aug 2013, 19:23
by lutleyyeltz
With tongue firmly planted in cheek may I quote the great W. C. Fields:
"Any man who hates kids and dogs can' t be all bad!"

Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 22 Aug 2013, 19:39
by gingeryeltz
Bring a dummy with you next time Lutters (I don't mean the chap you stand with)
Better still bring the little fekkers a pint of Batham's - that will shut them up!
Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 23 Aug 2013, 09:48
by lutleyyeltz
My mate,"
Big Mick," might be somewhat miffed at your reference to him.

As for the
Batham's - it usually makes me louder than usual, so not a good idea, although I'm sure it was well intentioned!

Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 23 Aug 2013, 12:54
by gingeryeltz
lutleyyeltz wrote:My mate,"
Big Mick," might be somewhat miffed at your reference to him.

I think you may have misinterpreted my post Lutters.
Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 23 Aug 2013, 12:54
by JohnC
Anyhow should "children be seen and not heard"?
I will try and keep quiet at the next game.

Re: Is it just me?
Posted: 23 Aug 2013, 14:08
by lutleyyeltz
gingeryeltz wrote:lutleyyeltz wrote:My mate,"
Big Mick," might be somewhat miffed at your reference to him.

I think you may have misinterpreted my post Lutters.
Not at all, old chap - I know you meant it in jest!
