Page 1 of 2
Godfrey Ingram
Posted: 14 May 2018, 22:46
by Laurel Lane Lamper
Re: Godfrey Ingram
Posted: 15 May 2018, 08:21
by YeltzDoc
A nice overview of a varied and interesting professional career.
They did seem to miss a couple of things out though.
Predominantly, that he’s a c*nt.
Re: Godfrey Ingram
Posted: 15 May 2018, 09:16
by Laurel Lane Lamper
Re: Godfrey Ingram
Posted: 15 May 2018, 09:28
by YeltzDoc
What are you doing to us Chas?
Urrrgh.
Re: Godfrey Ingram
Posted: 15 May 2018, 09:46
by Laurel Lane Lamper
I've not been well for a few days so I thought others could feel unwell too
Re: Godfrey Ingram
Posted: 15 May 2018, 10:43
by YeltzDoc
Can you find out anything on The Walrus and his burgeoning career as the snout baron of E Wing?
Just so we can get it all out of the way in one fell swoop.
Re: Godfrey Ingram
Posted: 15 May 2018, 10:48
by YeltzDoc
Oh, and I missed one.
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/comp ... 4/officers
As I think I may have commented at the time, it seems he had a job working as someone who takes an active and effective entity, then dilutes it until no trace of the authentic commodity remains, and yet still claims that it is as good or even better than the original.
And he was also a homeopath.
Re: Godfrey Ingram
Posted: 15 May 2018, 10:50
by Laurel Lane Lamper
Can't find anything since he was detained at Her Majesty's pleasure but you may like to recall how he looked
www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/8222 ... igarettes/
as if we'd forget
Re: Godfrey Ingram
Posted: 15 May 2018, 10:55
by YeltzDoc
He really did only own one suit.
Until he got the one with the little arrows on it.
Re: Godfrey Ingram
Posted: 15 May 2018, 11:10
by YeltzDoc
Even though I'm usually one of the Kings of "nostalgia ain't what it used to be" on here, I really do feel nauseous at this thread's rogues gallery.
And we haven't even got onto McNaughty, Sheriff Fatman, other convicted fraudsters and Lord knows who else.
I was discussing the current situation with HH the other day and he pointed out that, from his position as a glory hunter / arriviste / Johnny-come-lately / parvenu etc, with only about 20 something years of loyalty, he's had almost 50% of his time with us in the sh1te in one way or another.
And until the contracts are signed and in the vault, we're not out of it yet.
I really don't know what attracts them - we can't sell the land and it's a business that loses £50K a year, how could it be attractive to anyone other than those with it entrenched in their soul?
And, excluding Karen and Keith, who I'm sure come into the "soul" category, if in my lifetime I hear one more treatise about the club being in safe hands because the potential owners are "businessmen", I swear I will sit naked on the Harry Rudge Stand until the men in white coats come and take me away.
The condescension that it implies, supposing that football fans, and those from working class areas especially, are all forelock tugging serfs who should be grateful to anyone who works in a tie, for their mysterious powers to understand spreadsheets, when in reality they're more often fly-by-night merchants at best, makes me want to puke blood.
Anyway, you'd think I'd feel better after that rant.
I don't.